Where is AI value
stalling in your organisation?
Eleven questions. Ten minutes. A scored readiness snapshot across the three domains that decide whether AI investment becomes outcomes, weighted on the principle that roughly seventy percent of that value lives in people, process, and governance.
No signup to answer. Your responses are scored in your browser; nothing is sent anywhere until you choose to receive the written summary. How we handle data.
1 / 10 ·
Question
Your scorecard is ready.
See your readiness score and domain breakdown now. Add your email to unlock the written executive summary on screen, ready to print or share with your team.
Executive summary
Preparing your summary…
How this is scored
Eleven questions, each scored 0 to 4, normalised to 100 within its domain, then weighted 70 / 20 / 10. Scoring runs entirely in your browser. The written summary interprets those scores and computes nothing.
Cost of delay is modelled, not measured. The midpoint of the band you stated, multiplied by the share of readiness you have not reached, divided by four for the quarterly figure. It assumes readiness converts to realised value in a straight line, which is a simplification we cannot evidence. The open top band uses its floor and therefore understates.
Source for the weighting. Boston Consulting Group. (2024, December 6). The leader’s guide to transforming with AI. bcg.com. BCG states that 10% of effort belongs on algorithms, 20% on technology and data and 70% on people and processes. The 10-20-70 formulation is BCG’s. The questions, the scoring and the cost-of-delay model are AltNexus’s and are not endorsed by BCG.
An indicative self-assessment, not an audit and not professional advice. Accessibility · Version française · Bilingual delivery available on request.
The next step
This snapshot shows where the gap is. A full AI Velocity Gap Diagnostic engagement quantifies what it costs you and returns a sequenced, costed roadmap, with an outcome guarantee.